LANKnights / Electronic Gaming Society at UCF: Upgrade questions - LANKnights / Electronic Gaming Society at UCF

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Upgrade questions Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Kevin Icon

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 06-October 04

Posted 03 November 2004 - 06:14 PM

I'm helping a friend upgrade her PC. We suspect the motherboard's on the fritz, and it's too slow anyway, so we're going to replace the mobo, procesor, memory, and case. The HDD, CD-burner, and externals are all fine (probably), so we're going to try to cannibalize those and keep them. She wants to spend < $~400, so I was thinking a nice Intel P4 2.26 Ghz (or somewhere close to that speed), 533 Mhz FSB, socket 478 with a compatible mobo of some kind with everything on-board. That combination should be much more powerful than the 600Mhz she's used to, and still cost less and $200, enough left over for RAM and any other extras. It's nowhere close to cutting edge, but it'll being her into the new millennium.
Anyone have any comments or suggestions on this plan? Any particular type or brand of mobo I should look into?
Why is it that both drug addicts and computer aficionados are called users?

#2 User is offline   Emorocker918 Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 700
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 03 November 2004 - 07:01 PM

Another option is a Socket 754 AMD 64 2800 - $139 and an Socket 754 motherboard - $60 - $75. I know Socket 754 is on the way out, but its not like she'll upgrade in the next 5 years or so, plus once 64bit OS and apps are released, it will almost be another upgrade to her.

#3 User is offline   Darkfyre Icon

  • MERRY GO BOOM
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 270
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 01:49 AM

Or a Socket A mobo with a Barton 3200+... Still a contender.

#4 User is offline   optendo Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,871
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 12:15 PM

i am all about the 2 posts^
I personally am an AMD only person...plus the AMD chips usually are cheaper.
aka chris' lover aka former PC Gaming Club President :confused:

#5 User is offline   Kevin Icon

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 06-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 12:58 PM

I know there's all those arguments for AMD, but I mostly know about Intel architectures, and we're both Intel people over here anyway...but thanks for the advice.
Why is it that both drug addicts and computer aficionados are called users?

#6 User is offline   Pollux Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,887
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 01:01 PM

Kevin said:

I know there's all those arguments for AMD, but I mostly know about Intel architectures, and we're both Intel people over here anyway...but thanks for the advice.


Why would knowing about Intel architectures even matter?

#7 User is offline   Bucu Icon

  • Staff
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,271
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 01:31 PM

builds e-penis, go intel :-p
UCF Alum '07
Vice President 06-07
Director of Events 05-07

Posted Image

Facebook
Myspace
Posted Image

#8 User is offline   optendo Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,871
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 02:30 PM

usually amd chips are cheaper...save the money and put it forth something else.
aka chris' lover aka former PC Gaming Club President :confused:

#9 User is offline   Darkfyre Icon

  • MERRY GO BOOM
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 270
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 04:05 PM

And they perform better for the price. Whats the difference in the architecture? Procs are plug and play if the proc and the mobo are compatible socket wise.

#10 User is offline   Emorocker918 Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 700
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 05:58 PM

The difference in architecture is Intel's is ineffecient due to them having a monopoly for so long and getting lazy, which is why they have been pushing more ghz = more power, which most of us here know they don't.

#11 User is offline   BUDMAN Icon

  • I'm Batman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,705
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 06:55 PM

AMDs are much more efficient than intel hence...why they are slower yet do the same thing
XBL -- TEH BUDMAN13

Posted ImagePosted Image
"Proper punctuation makes the difference in helping your uncle, Jack, off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse."

#12 User is offline   Mwarhead Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,022
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 07 November 2004 - 06:46 PM

Quote

i am all about the 2 posts^
I personally am an AMD only person...plus the AMD chips usually are cheaper.

Definetly agree.

#13 User is offline   Kevin Icon

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 06-October 04

Posted 03 November 2004 - 06:14 PM

I'm helping a friend upgrade her PC. We suspect the motherboard's on the fritz, and it's too slow anyway, so we're going to replace the mobo, procesor, memory, and case. The HDD, CD-burner, and externals are all fine (probably), so we're going to try to cannibalize those and keep them. She wants to spend < $~400, so I was thinking a nice Intel P4 2.26 Ghz (or somewhere close to that speed), 533 Mhz FSB, socket 478 with a compatible mobo of some kind with everything on-board. That combination should be much more powerful than the 600Mhz she's used to, and still cost less and $200, enough left over for RAM and any other extras. It's nowhere close to cutting edge, but it'll being her into the new millennium.
Anyone have any comments or suggestions on this plan? Any particular type or brand of mobo I should look into?
Why is it that both drug addicts and computer aficionados are called users?

#14 User is offline   Emorocker918 Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 700
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 03 November 2004 - 07:01 PM

Another option is a Socket 754 AMD 64 2800 - $139 and an Socket 754 motherboard - $60 - $75. I know Socket 754 is on the way out, but its not like she'll upgrade in the next 5 years or so, plus once 64bit OS and apps are released, it will almost be another upgrade to her.

#15 User is offline   Darkfyre Icon

  • MERRY GO BOOM
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 270
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 01:49 AM

Or a Socket A mobo with a Barton 3200+... Still a contender.

#16 User is offline   optendo Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,871
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 12:15 PM

i am all about the 2 posts^
I personally am an AMD only person...plus the AMD chips usually are cheaper.
aka chris' lover aka former PC Gaming Club President :confused:

#17 User is offline   Kevin Icon

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: 06-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 12:58 PM

I know there's all those arguments for AMD, but I mostly know about Intel architectures, and we're both Intel people over here anyway...but thanks for the advice.
Why is it that both drug addicts and computer aficionados are called users?

#18 User is offline   Pollux Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,887
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 01:01 PM

Kevin said:

I know there's all those arguments for AMD, but I mostly know about Intel architectures, and we're both Intel people over here anyway...but thanks for the advice.


Why would knowing about Intel architectures even matter?

#19 User is offline   Bucu Icon

  • Staff
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,271
  • Joined: 04-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 01:31 PM

builds e-penis, go intel :-p
UCF Alum '07
Vice President 06-07
Director of Events 05-07

Posted Image

Facebook
Myspace
Posted Image

#20 User is offline   optendo Icon

  • Senior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,871
  • Joined: 05-October 04

Posted 04 November 2004 - 02:30 PM

usually amd chips are cheaper...save the money and put it forth something else.
aka chris' lover aka former PC Gaming Club President :confused:

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users